With all of that, she would get four to five days to 24 hours and also monitor sleep. During testing, I gave the Vivosmart to my teenage daughter, who walks about three-quarters of a mile to school and is on her feet a lot between classes, as well as going to extracurricular activities like Army Cadets and Girl Guides. I spend a large part of my day sitting at a desk and writing, and considering that, I’d say it’s doable. If you’re not recording things through your phone, the Vivosmart has its own accelerometer that will automatically record certain activities, but it very likely is.īattery life is decent for such a small device. Once you learn the format, it’s easy to navigate. The Vivoactive is easy to use, containing just a single button and a touchscreen that you swipe most of the time. Speaking of competition, Polar’s Unite is 49p less than the Garmin, and it doesn’t have its own GPS receiver either, but it does come with a full-size color screen, putting the Vivosmart’s monochrome offering to shame. One downside to the Vivosmart is that it doesn’t come with its own GPS receiver, so it relies on a Bluetooth connection to your phone for recording.įitbit’s Charge 5, at the same price as the Garmin, comes with its own GPS, which I prefer as it saves battery life on both devices It also has a color screen. While the watch shows you a summary of distance, ride time, average speed, average heart rate and calories, you get a lot more out of the app from a cycling perspective: You get a lot of data from your ride including a route map and various graphics on heart rate, speed, incline etc. Selecting ‘Bike’ in the activity menu will show distance, speed and ride time on the small screen when you’re on the go, and when you’ve finished your ride the 5 will upload everything to the Connect app, which is actually very good. > Buying Guide: 10 Best Cheap GPS Bike Computers Most of my rides are on the same roads or gravel loops week in and week out so I really don’t need a lot of data while on the bike and the Vivosmart works for me. Well, yes, depending on how much data you want. So, the reason you’re here: Does it work for cycling? But if you really focus on things through training or illness, it can really be beneficial. I have to confess, I have a Garmin 530, a Forerunner 735XT, and a Fenix 6 Pro, and I hardly ever use any of that stuff, with just a cursory glance when it’s uploaded to the Garmin Connect app. In fact, the Vivosmart can monitor quite a bit, either through data you input or through sensors and algorithms like body battery, pulse oxygen rate, sleep score, stress, hydration, breathing, women’s health and fitness age. Heart rate is monitored via the wrist and while this isn’t as accurate as a chest strap, I found it to be fairly accurate at various exercise levels – definitely far more accurate than some of the £20 ebay/Amazon jobs I’ve bought to compare. It’s small and looks fairly unassuming, just like a stylish watch, while avidly recording your daily data like heart rate, steps and sleep patterns, and using that to give estimates of calories burned and whatnot. However, its monochrome screen and lack of GPS are a compromise at this price point.įor its small size, the Vivosmart 5 is a pretty capable piece of wearable tech. Garmin’s Vivosmart 5 isn’t specific to cycling, but if you’re looking for an all-round fitness tracker that records rides and your overall daily well-being, in a smart but discreet package that looks just as at home with Lycra or your Civvies, then there’s one good choice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |